<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Drone on Know the Tech</title>
        <link>https://knowthe.tech/tags/drone/</link>
        <description>Recent content in Drone on Know the Tech</description>
        <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>knowthe.tech</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://knowthe.tech/tags/drone/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
        <title>FCC Plans Retroactive Ban on Disguised DJI Gadgets Like Skyrover and Xtra</title>
        <link>https://knowthe.tech/p/fcc-plans-retroactive-ban-on-disguised-dji-gadgets-like-skyrover-and-xtra/</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        
        <guid>https://knowthe.tech/p/fcc-plans-retroactive-ban-on-disguised-dji-gadgets-like-skyrover-and-xtra/</guid>
        <description>&lt;img src="https://knowthe.tech/imgs/fcc-dji-drone-ban.jpg" alt="Featured image of post FCC Plans Retroactive Ban on Disguised DJI Gadgets Like Skyrover and Xtra" /&gt;&lt;p&gt;The US Federal Communications Commission is preparing to use its newly claimed power to retroactively ban gadgets that have already received FCC approval — and it&amp;rsquo;s targeting the &amp;ldquo;DJI front companies&amp;rdquo; suspected of sneaking the Chinese dronemaker&amp;rsquo;s technology past the agency&amp;rsquo;s foreign drone ban for the first time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The move threatens to effectively banish Skyrover drones and Xtra cameras from the US market, even though many of these products previously received FCC authorization.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;stepping-up-enforcement&#34;&gt;Stepping Up Enforcement
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;Last October, the FCC granted itself the authority to retroactively ban devices that had already been certified for import and sale in the United States. Now the commission is preparing to wield that power for the first time, going after companies it believes are acting as fronts for DJI.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just two weeks ago, the FCC proposed a $25,000 fine on eight of these &amp;ldquo;front companies,&amp;rdquo; including the firms behind Skyrover drones and Xtra cameras. But the agency is now proposing far tougher measures — outright bans on importing, distributing, marketing, and selling their existing products.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;the-xtra-muse-and-skyrover-connection&#34;&gt;The Xtra Muse and Skyrover Connection
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;The most prominent example is the Xtra Muse, a camera that bears more than a passing resemblance to the DJI Osmo Pocket 3. The Verge highlighted a deal on Xtra&amp;rsquo;s version of the popular gimbal camera just two weeks ago — a product that received FCC approval before the drone ban ever came down and is currently available on Amazon with next-day shipping.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Skyrover drones have similarly been identified as rebranded or thinly disguised DJI hardware, designed to circumvent the FCC&amp;rsquo;s restrictions on the Chinese manufacturer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the retroactive ban goes into effect, these products would need to disappear from all major online retailers and the companies&amp;rsquo; own websites. Firms may even need to write off inventory sitting in US warehouses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;what-the-ban-would-mean&#34;&gt;What the Ban Would Mean
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;The FCC&amp;rsquo;s proposed action would have significant practical consequences. Products that already have FCC certification — and are legally being sold right now — could be pulled from shelves. Companies found to be fronting for DJI would face not just fines but a complete prohibition on participating in the US market.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, the ban would &lt;strong&gt;not&lt;/strong&gt; affect gadgets that consumers have already purchased. It also would not take effect immediately. The FCC is currently accepting public comments for 30 days before making a final determination.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;broader-context&#34;&gt;Broader Context
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;This enforcement action is part of a larger US government crackdown on DJI, the world&amp;rsquo;s largest drone manufacturer. Concerns over national security and data privacy have driven multiple regulatory efforts against the Chinese company, including restrictions on federal use of DJI equipment and ongoing scrutiny of its business practices.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The retroactive ban represents a significant escalation in the FCC&amp;rsquo;s regulatory approach. By targeting products that were previously approved — and using that authority against alleged front companies — the commission is signaling a more aggressive posture toward foreign technology companies it considers security risks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 30-day comment period gives affected companies and interested parties time to respond before the FCC makes its final decision.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>
