If you’ve shopped for a new router lately, the Wi‑Fi 7 badge is everywhere — from budget $80 boxes to premium models costing as much as a laptop. But according to a recent investigation by Engadget, that label doesn’t always deliver what it promises. Between a trademark loophole, missing core features, and a federal supply-chain block, the Wi‑Fi 7 market is more confusing — and deceptive — than most buyers realise.
What Wi‑Fi 7 Actually Requires
Wi‑Fi 7 (formally IEEE 802.11be) brings three major upgrades over Wi‑Fi 6E: 320 MHz channel widths (double the previous maximum), 4K-QAM for higher peak data rates, and most importantly — Multi‑Link Operation (MLO).
MLO is the defining feature of Wi‑Fi 7. Instead of treating the 2.4 GHz, 5 GHz, and 6 GHz bands as separate connections, MLO lets a router use them all simultaneously, distributing traffic based on load and interference for dramatically lower latency. The Wi‑Fi Alliance requires at least NSTR (Non-Simultaneous Transmit and Receive) mode for any product to earn the official “Wi‑Fi Certified 7” stamp.
The Hyphen Loophole
Here’s where marketing gets tricky. The Wi‑Fi Alliance owns the trademark for “Wi‑Fi” — with a hyphen. When a manufacturer labels a product “WiFi 7” (no hyphen), it technically isn’t using the trademarked term and is no longer bound by the Alliance’s certification requirements.
The result? Plenty of “WiFi 7” routers on the market today ship without MLO entirely, meaning buyers pay a premium for hardware that can’t deliver the standard’s headline feature.
Even Certified Routers Fall Short
Even among officially certified models, MLO performance is often underwhelming. Testing firm RTINGS evaluated 25 Wi‑Fi 7 routers in February 2026 and found that true simultaneous MLO — which requires multiple physically independent radios syncing across bands — is rare. Most units alternate between bands, leading to fluctuating speeds that don’t justify the price premium over Wi‑Fi 6E.
The FCC Roadblock
On March 23, 2026, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) blocked certification of new wireless hardware manufactured outside the United States. This effectively froze the US router market. While Netgear and Eero have secured exemptions by committing to US-based manufacturing, major brands like TP‑Link, ASUS, and Linksys are stuck selling only models certified before the ban.
Newer, more capable Wi‑Fi 7 routers that could address current shortcomings simply can’t enter the country.
Should You Buy Wi‑Fi 7?
For most households, the answer is no — at least not yet. Wi‑Fi 7’s multi-gigabit speeds (2–3.5 Gbps locally) are wasted on a typical 500 Mbps internet plan. Moreover, very few devices support Wi‑Fi 7 — Apple’s first Wi‑Fi 7 laptops arrived only in early 2026 with the M5 chip, while the M4 MacBook Pro and MacBook Air still shipped with Wi‑Fi 6E.
Wi‑Fi 6 remains an excellent choice for sub‑gigabit plans, and Wi‑Fi 6E adds the 6 GHz band for a clean, uncongested channel at lower prices than Wi‑Fi 7. Unless you have multi‑gigabit fiber, multiple Wi‑Fi 7 devices, and heavy local network transfer needs, the premium for Wi‑Fi 7 is hard to justify.
The Bottom Line
As Engadget’s investigation makes clear, the Wi‑Fi 7 router market faces a triple problem: a certification standard that permits the cheapest possible MLO implementation, a trademark loophole that lets brands skip even that baseline, and an FCC ban that has stalled hardware improvements. If your current router delivers the speeds your internet plan promises, you’re better off waiting for the market to mature.